Tuesday, September 20, 2011

ACTIONABLE FRAUD AND USURPATION BY GREED AND AVARICE

NOTE:This was a letter I submitted to The Sierra Club, NORML and other entities supporting the legalization of Hemp. To this date, I have heard nothing back from them.
                 


 A viable plan to derail past and current hemp/marijuana laws and legislation by suing the perpetrating families that still profit from the lies, deceit and fraudulent conspiratorial nature of those laws and legislations.









The People v the Hearsts

The People v the Du Ponts          





To  the Sierra Club, NORML, the ACLU,

       

It is far past time to reconcile some legal atrocities of the past 100 years or so beginning with the “fraudulent” and greed driven agenda of certain individuals whose families are still benefitting to this day by said fraud which creates the circumstance of ongoing criminal offense by said perps .  As you know, thanks to the Internal Revenue Service (IRS), there is no statute of limitations on fraud and once fraud is detected, an individual or group of individuals can take legal action within six years of that discovery. Furthermore, any law or action attained via fraud is considered null and void on its face as soon as the fraud is proven!

What I refer to here is the illegalization of hemp aka marijuana. If what I understand is correct this plant, which is grown in nature and in my opinion should never have been under government jurisdiction and scrutiny, was illegalized under conspiratorial and fraudulent means with greed driven motivations  using propaganda and mass media hysterics to coerce and unwitting Congress (with the exceptions of some in collusion) and public action all based on said fraud and lies. The following is the information I base my claims upon and if they do not hold up to scrutiny, I would ask that you point out where I am in error. Here are some excerpts from the article which I refer to and the link to complete article:



[THE CONSPIRACY


William Randolph Hearst (Citizen Kane) and the Hearst Paper Manufacturing
Division of Kimberly Clark owned vast acreage of timberlands. The Hearst Company
supplied most paper products. Patty Hearst's grandfather, a destroyer of nature
for his own personal profit, stood to lose billions because of hemp.

In 1937, DuPont patented the processes to make plastics from oil and coal.
DuPont's Annual Report urged stockholders to invest in its new petrochemical
division. Synthetics such as plastics, cellophane, celluloid, methanol, nylon,
rayon, Dacron, etc., could now be made from oil.Natural hemp industrialization
would have ruined over 80% of DuPont's business.

Andrew Mellon became Hoover's Secretary of the Treasury and DuPont's primary
investor. He appointed his future nephew-in-law, Harry J.Anslinger, to head the
Federal Bureau of Narcotics and Dangerous Drugs.

Secret meetings were held by these financial tycoons. Hemp was declared
dangerous and a threat to their billion dollar enterprises. For their dynasties
to remain intact, hemp had to go. These men took an obscure Mexican slang word:
`marijuana' and pushed it into the consciousness of America.

MEDIA MANIPULATION


A media blitz of `yellow journalism' raged in the late 1920s and 1930s. Hearst's
newspapers ran stories emphasizing the horrors of marijuana. The menace of
marijuana made headlines. Readers learned that it was responsible for everything
from car accidents to loose morality.

Films like Reefer Madness (1936), Marijuana: Assassin of Youth (1935) and
Marijuana: The Devil's Weed (1936) were propaganda designed by these
industrialists to create an enemy. Their purpose was to gain public support so
that anti-marijuana laws could be passed.


Examine the following quotes from The Burning Question, aka Reefer Madness:

* a violent narcotic;

* acts of shocking violence;

* incurable insanity;

* soul-destroying effects;

* under the influence of the drug he killed his entire family with an ax;

* more vicious, more deadly even than these soul-destroying drugs (heroin,
cocaine) is the menace of marijuana!

Reefer Madness did not end with the usual `the end.' The film concluded with
these words plastered on the screen: `Tell your children.'

In the 1930s, people were very naive, even to the point of ignorance. The masses
were like sheep waiting to be led by the few in power. They did not challenge
authority. If the news was in print or on the radio, they believed it had to be
true. They told their children, and their children grew up to be the parents of
the babyboomers.

On April 14, 1937, the prohibitive Marijuana Tax Law, or the bill that outlawed
hemp, was directly brought to the House Ways and Means Committee. This committee
is the only one that can introduce a bill to the House floor without it being
debated by other committees. The Chairman of the U.S. Senate, Ways and Means
Committee, at the time, Robert Doughton, was a DuPont supporter. He insured that
the bill would pass Congress.

Dr. James Woodward, a physician and attorney, testified too late on behalf of
the American Medical Association. He told the committee that the reason the AMA
had not denounced the Marijuana Tax Law sooner was that the Association had just
discovered that marijuana was hemp.

Few people, at the time, realized that the deadly menace they had been reading
about on Hearst's front pages was in fact passive hemp. The AMA understood
cannabis to be a medicine found in numerous healing products sold over the last
hundred years.

In September of 1937, hemp became illegal. The most useful crop known became a
drug and our planet has been suffering ever since.

Congress banned hemp because it was said to be the most violence-causing drug
known. Harry Anslinger, head of the Drug Commission for 31 years, promoted the
idea that marijuana made users act extremely violent. In the 1950s, under the
Communist threat of McCarthyism, Anslinger then said the exact opposite:
marijuana will pacify you so much that soldiers would not want to fight.

Today, our planet is in desperate trouble. Earth is suffocating as large tracts
of rain forests disappear. Pollution, poisons and chemicals are killing people.
These great problems could be reversed if we industrialized hemp. Natural
biomass could provide all of the planet's energy needs that are currently
supplied by fossil fuels. We have consumed 80% of our oil and gas reserves. We
need a renewable resource. Hemp could be the solution to soaring gas prices.]

 If the above facts are true than the families in question are guilty of fraud and deception of the highest magnitude as well as crimes promulgated and ongoing against the Earth and humanity which has caused much undo grief and suffering to the populace of not only this country but those it influences.

 My proposal is a full out frontal legal assault upon the perps as this is a continuing, ongoing offense which has tolled infinite pain and suffering of the many at the financial (in the billions) benefit of the few.

It is my legal assertion that the perps have benefitted through crimes of malicious conspiratorial fraud which has deprived the many of the vast benefit of the hemp plant in direct conflict with nature based on fabrications, outright lies, propaganda conspiracy and fraud with the only remedy being default judgement in the hundreds of billions of dollars illegally gleaned by said perps as a direct result of that fraud.

What will be required are: Subpoena’s of all government documentation regarding the illegalization of hemp. Subpoenas of all archived materials and sources of the propaganda campaigns of the day. This should be done in such a way as to make the government look like a victim in said fraud while keeping the door open to the immediate nullification of all marijuana laws. 

If you people are serious about the environment we live in and grow our food in then it is inexcusable to ignore this letter. If I had the monetary means to pursue legal action, I would do so without hesitation. It is my hope that those of you interested in the end of the war on hemp will pool your resources and take on the Hearst and DuPont dynasties in an all out legal battle which could forever change the laws on hemp and remunerate all whom have suffered from their enactment.



Thank you,
Dave Taanru

No comments:

Post a Comment